https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00578-6
Regular Article - Experimental Physics
Fast-neutron induced reaction cross section measurement of tin with dual monitor foils and covariance analysis
1
Department of Nuclear and Atomic Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, 400005, Mumbai, India
2
Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, 221005, Varanasi, India
3
Nuclear Data Section, Division of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, A-1400, Wien, Austria
4
Department of Physics, University of Calicut, 673635, Calicut, Kerala, India
5
India-Based Neutrino Observatory (INO), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, 400005, Mumbai, India
6
Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushaktinagar, 400094, Mumbai, India
7
Bhabha Atomic Research Center, 400085, Mumbai, India
8
Department of Physics, Bangalore University, 560056, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
9
PQM-lab, The Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, 411007, Pune, India
10
Department of Physics, Bengaluru City University, 560001, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
a pcrl.bec@gmail.com, rebecca24@bhu.ac.in
Received:
26
May
2021
Accepted:
26
August
2021
Published online:
6
September
2021
The fast-neutron induced elemental cross sections have been measured relative to the Au(n,2n)
Au and
Al(n,
)
Na monitor cross sections at 14.5 ± 0.2 MeV by using a natural Sn sample and the activation technique for production of
Sn,
Sn
,
Sn
,
In (cumulative),
In
,
In
,
In
(cumulative), and
In
. The off-diagonal weighted mean of the elemental cross sections were determined by constructing the covariance between the cross sections obtained with the two monitor cross sections. From the measured elemental cross sections, the respective isotopic cross sections were also determined for the
Sn(n,2n)
Sn,
Sn(n,2n)
Sn
,
Sn(n,x)
In and
Sn(n,p)
In
reactions. The comparison of the measured elemental and isotopic cross sections with those in the EXFOR, JEFF-3.1/A, JENDL/AD-2017 and TENDL-2019 libraries as well as those predicted by TALYS-1.9 is discussed.
The original online version of this article was revised: In Table 3 of this article, the data in column 2 was improperly headed. “(keV)” was replaced by “(%)”.
An erratum to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00588-4.
Copyright comment corrected publication 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021. corrected publication 2021