https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01656-9
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Revised QCD effects on the Z
forward–backward asymmetry in
collisions
1
CERN, EP Department, 1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland
2
Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA
Received:
20
April
2025
Accepted:
30
July
2025
Published online:
14
August
2025
The forward–backward (FB) asymmetry of b quarks in
collisions at the Z pole measured at LEP,
, remains today one of the electroweak precision observables with the largest disagreement (2.4
) with respect to the Standard Model prediction,
. Beyond the dominant statistical uncertainties, QCD effects, such as b-quark showering and hadronization, are the leading sources of
systematic uncertainty, and have not been revised in the last twenty years. We reassess the QCD uncertainties of the eight original
LEP measurements, using modern parton shower pythia 8 and vincia simulations with nine different implementations of soft and collinear radiation as well as of parton fragmentation. Our analysis, combined with NNLO massive b-quark corrections independently computed, indicates total propagated QCD uncertainties of
0.7% and
0.3% for the lepton- and jet-charge analyses, respectively, that are about a factor of two smaller than those of the original LEP results. Accounting for such updated QCD effects leads to a new
average, with a data-theory tension slightly reduced from 2.4
to 2.2
. Confirmation or resolution of this long-term discrepancy requires a new high-luminosity
collider collecting orders-of-magnitude more data at the Z pole to significantly reduce the dominant
statistical uncertainties, and to improve our understanding of b-quark showering and hadronization.
© The Author(s) 2026
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

