Open Access
Published online: 04 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14107-9
Published online: 07 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14108-8
On determining the cross section of the supposed pentaquark
Published online: 09 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14109-7
Published online: 11 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14110-2
Open Access
Published online: 14 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14111-1
Published online: 16 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14112-0
Published online: 16 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14113-y
Published online: 17 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14114-x
Published online: 23 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14115-9
Published online: 23 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14116-8
Published online: 25 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14117-7
Published online: 28 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14118-6
Published online: 30 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14119-5
Published online: 30 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14120-0
Open Access
Erratum
Published online: 31 July 2014
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14121-y
Editors-in-Chief
David Blaschke, Thomas Duguet and Maria Jose Garcia Borge
David Blaschke, Thomas Duguet and Maria Jose Garcia Borge
We express our heartfelt thanks for the valuable suggestions, which helped us for improving our manuscript.