Published online: 27 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16205-0
Published online: 26 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16202-3
Published online: 21 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16198-6
Published online: 21 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16197-7
Published online: 19 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16190-2
Published online: 18 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16187-9
Published online: 05 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16185-y
Published online: 01 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16183-1
Published online: 28 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16210-3
Published online: 28 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16209-8
Published online: 28 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16208-9
Published online: 27 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16207-x
Open Access
Published online: 27 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16206-y
Open Access
Erratum
Published online: 27 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16204-1
Published online: 26 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16203-2
Published online: 22 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16201-4
Published online: 22 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16200-5
Published online: 21 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16199-5
Published online: 21 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16196-8
Published online: 21 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16195-9
Measurement of flux-weighted average cross-sections and isomeric yield ratios for 103Rh(
Published online: 20 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16194-x
Formation of
Published online: 20 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16193-y
Published online: 20 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16192-0
Published online: 20 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16191-1
Published online: 19 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16189-7
Open Access
Published online: 19 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16188-8
Open Access
Published online: 18 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16186-x
Published online: 05 July 2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16184-0
Editors-in-Chief
David Blaschke, Thomas Duguet and Maria Jose Garcia Borge
David Blaschke, Thomas Duguet and Maria Jose Garcia Borge
Thank you, yet again, for an excellent set of proofs and the meticulous work you do! ... We are glad to see that EPJA maintains its high standards.