https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00065-4
Regular Article - Experimental Physics
Vector-analyzing powers in the
and
channels at 135 MeV
1
KVI-CART, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
2
Department of Physics, School of Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
3
Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
4
M.Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
5
Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
6
Institute of Nuclear Physics, PAS, Kraków, Poland
7
Department of Physics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran
8
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
9
Department of Physics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10
Institute of Physics, University of Silesia, Chorzów, Poland
* e-mail: meslami@yazd.ac.ir
Received:
1
September
2019
Accepted:
1
January
2020
Published online:
19
February
2020
Vector-analyzing powers, and
, of the proton–deuteron break-up reaction have been measured by using a polarized-proton beam at 135 MeV impinging on a liquid-deuterium target. For the experiment, the big instrument for nuclear-polarization analysis (BINA) was used at KVI, Groningen, the Netherlands. The data are compared to the predictions of Faddeev calculations using state-of-the-art two- and three-nucleon potentials. Our data are reasonably well described by calculations for the kinematical configurations at which the three-nucleon force (3NF) effect is predicted to be small. However, striking discrepancies are observed at specific configurations, in particular in the cases of symmetric configurations, where the relative azimuthal angle between the two protons is small which corresponds to the
channel. The vector-analyzing powers of these configurations are compared to the proton–deuteron elastic scattering to study the spin–isospin sensitivity of the 3NF models. The results are compared to the earlier results of the proton–deuteron break-up reaction at 190 MeV proton-beam energy [1]. Disagreement is observed for both proton-beam energies between data and calculations which points to a deficiency in the treatment of spin–isospin part of the 3NF.
© Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature, 2020